Reality views by sm :
Do Jasoos (1975)
Actors : Aruna Irani, Asit Sen, Bhavana Bhatt, Prem Chopra, Raj Kapoor, Rajendra Kumar, Shailendra
Director : Naresh Kumar
Lyrics : Hasrat Jaipuri, Ravindra Jain
Music Director : Ravindra Jain
Producer : Narayan, Naresh Kumar
Theme : Suspense
Following are the lyrics of song 'Do Jasoos Kare Mehsoos' from movie 'Do Jasoos'.
One of the very realistic songs in this year 2009 also.Read English Translation below hindi lyrics.
do jasoos kare mehsoos, ke duniya badi kharab hai
kaun hai sachcha, kaun hai jhoota, har chehare pe naqaab hai
jara socho, jara samajho, jara sambhalake rahio ji - (2)
do jasoos kare mehsoos, ke duniya badi kharab hai
pyaas lage toh doodh piyo, doodh mein paani milata hai
mandir mein bhi aaj diya nakali ghee ka milata hai
na asali mithaayi hai, na asali malaayi hai
maava hai sinhgaade ka, kya jaalim halwaayi hai
aate mein mitti, chaawal mein kankar behisaab hai
kaun hai sachcha, kaun hai jhoota, har chehare pe naqaab hai
jara socho, jara samajho, jara sambhalake rahio ji - (2)
do jasoos kare mehsoos, ke duniya badi kharab hai
jehar dawa mein shaamil hai, jeher dawa se behtar hai
jehar bhi nakali milata hai, marana bhi abb dubar hai
desh ke sachche dushman hai, yeh jo milavat karate hai
inaki badaulat kitane log maut se pehale marate hai
aise logon ko pakadaana sabse bada sawaab hai
kaun hai sachcha, kaun hai jhoota, har chehare pe naqaab hai
jara socho socho, jara samajho samajho, jara sambhalake rahio ji
do jasoos kare mehsoos, ke duniya badi kharab hai
jab dekho hadtaale hai, jaane kisaki chaale hai
samjhaute ka naam nahi, agni mein ghee daale hai
deewaane tufaan kare, logon ko hairaan kare
neharu ji ko bhool gaye, baapu ka apmaan kare - (2)
apna hi ghar phoonk rahe hai kaisa inqlaab hai
kaun hai sachcha, kaun hai jhoota, har chehare pe naqaab hai
jara socho, jara samajho, jara sambhalake rahio ji - (2)
do jasoos kare mehsoos, ke duniya badi kharab hai
kaun hai sachcha, kaun hai jhoota, har chehare pe naqaab hai
jara socho, jara samajho, jara sambhalake rahio ji
do jasoos kare mehsoos, ke (duniya badi kharab hai -2)
English Translation of song 'Do Jasoos Kare Mehsoos' from movie 'Do Jasoos'.
two detectives feels that the world is bad
who is true, who is false/fraud, every face has a mask
think little, understand little, live with care
if u r thirsty, drink milk, u will get water in milk
the lamps burning in the temples also contain duplicate/fake ghee
neither the sweat is real/original, nor the butter is original
this is the extract of water chestnut (not sure what it means), how cruel the sweat maker is?
there is dust in flour and tiny stones in rice, which are uncountable
poison is included in medicine, poison is better than the medicine
the poison is also duplicate that its difficult to die as well
these are the true enemies of country who are fraud (who makes such mixtures)
b'z of these people many people die before their death,everyday
to catch such people is the biggest reward
many times there are strikes, don't know who's plans are these
there is no sign of understating, these people are just adding oil to the fire
such people create storms and make people confused/disturbed
people have forgotten Neharuji and also are insulting Gandhiji
they are blowing up fire in their own home, what kind of revolution/change is this?
Monday, May 11, 2009
Saturday, May 9, 2009
India – Caste System -Know 21 prohibitions for Untouchables, Dalit
India – Caste System -Know 21 prohibitions for Untouchables, Dalit
In June 1931, the incident has occurred in the Ramnad District of the Madras Presidency. The superior class people the Kallar met together and framed eleven prohibitions for untouchables, exterior class.
These eleven prohibitions were:—
Read more »
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
India: Come May 31 and we will see pictorial warning on Cigarette Packages
Reality views by sm :
India: Come May 31 and we will see pictorial warning on Cigarette Packages:
One more time, Supreme Court of India has given good judgment by directing to the government that cigarette packages must have pictorial warning like skull and cross bones on cigarette packs.
The sad part is that for this good cause also NGO has to file a case to get this order from Supreme Court of India.
Did you hear about this that any media channel has reported that this type of case is going on in supreme court of India .When there is case like Aarushi rape and murder this media shows it for 24 hours daily but when such a cause arise our media do not give more than few minutes . "Since the 2006 act (mandating pictorial warnings) was passed, the issue was being diluted or delayed for one reason or another by government of India
Even now, had the Supreme Court not stepped in, there would have been further delay."
P.C. Gupta, director of the Healis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, said: "It is most unfortunate that the GoM, since its constitution in early 2007, had delayed the implementation of the law for two whole years, not to mention having diluted the stronger warning for a milder one."
In this order supreme court has added very good note that no other court is permitted to give injunction ,stop, or modify or inconsistent order ,conflicting order with this order this order of supreme court of India ..
Health warning labels on cigarette packages were introduced in the United States in 1965 to inform consumers about the health risks associated with tobacco use. The 1965 Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act required that the statement, Caution: Cigarette smoking may be hazardous to your health.
In 1984, Usa ,Congress enacted the Comprehensive Smoking Education Act, which required rotation of the following four black and white text messages on the side of cigarette packages:
Surgeon General’s warning: Smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and may complicate pregnancy.
Quitting smoking now greatly reduces serious risks to your health.
Smoking by pregnant women may result in fetal injury, premature birth, and low birth weight.
Cigarette smoke contains carbon monoxide.
Canada has already method of warning through pictures on the cigarette packages .
Pictures warnings are effective and they really work .Just think when 14 year old boy or 20 year old boy first time will take the cigarette packet in his hands and he sees dangerous and real pictures what cigarette can cause him he may put down the cigarette packet forever.
Just think if Cola bottle has such labels or your sweet box has such labels like showing
Lizards will you eat them or drink them, will you enjoy them.
Twelve countries have laws requiring picture-based health warnings, according to the Canadian Cancer Society, including:
• Australia
• Belgium
• Brazil
• Canada
• Chile •
• Jordan
• New Zealand
• Singapore
• Thailand
• Uruguay
• Venezuela
In UK , people choose 15 pictures which should be used on cigarette packets. We hope in India the chosen pictures will be effective in nature showing like Canada .
India: Come May 31 and we will see pictorial warning on Cigarette Packages:
One more time, Supreme Court of India has given good judgment by directing to the government that cigarette packages must have pictorial warning like skull and cross bones on cigarette packs.
The sad part is that for this good cause also NGO has to file a case to get this order from Supreme Court of India.
Did you hear about this that any media channel has reported that this type of case is going on in supreme court of India .When there is case like Aarushi rape and murder this media shows it for 24 hours daily but when such a cause arise our media do not give more than few minutes . "Since the 2006 act (mandating pictorial warnings) was passed, the issue was being diluted or delayed for one reason or another by government of India
Even now, had the Supreme Court not stepped in, there would have been further delay."
P.C. Gupta, director of the Healis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, said: "It is most unfortunate that the GoM, since its constitution in early 2007, had delayed the implementation of the law for two whole years, not to mention having diluted the stronger warning for a milder one."
In this order supreme court has added very good note that no other court is permitted to give injunction ,stop, or modify or inconsistent order ,conflicting order with this order this order of supreme court of India ..
Health warning labels on cigarette packages were introduced in the United States in 1965 to inform consumers about the health risks associated with tobacco use. The 1965 Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act required that the statement, Caution: Cigarette smoking may be hazardous to your health.
In 1984, Usa ,Congress enacted the Comprehensive Smoking Education Act, which required rotation of the following four black and white text messages on the side of cigarette packages:
Surgeon General’s warning: Smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and may complicate pregnancy.
Quitting smoking now greatly reduces serious risks to your health.
Smoking by pregnant women may result in fetal injury, premature birth, and low birth weight.
Cigarette smoke contains carbon monoxide.
Canada has already method of warning through pictures on the cigarette packages .
Pictures warnings are effective and they really work .Just think when 14 year old boy or 20 year old boy first time will take the cigarette packet in his hands and he sees dangerous and real pictures what cigarette can cause him he may put down the cigarette packet forever.
Just think if Cola bottle has such labels or your sweet box has such labels like showing
Lizards will you eat them or drink them, will you enjoy them.
Twelve countries have laws requiring picture-based health warnings, according to the Canadian Cancer Society, including:
• Australia
• Belgium
• Brazil
• Canada
• Chile •
• Jordan
• New Zealand
• Singapore
• Thailand
• Uruguay
• Venezuela
In UK , people choose 15 pictures which should be used on cigarette packets. We hope in India the chosen pictures will be effective in nature showing like Canada .
Taj Mahal the True Story by P.N.Oak : part one
Reality views by sm :
Taj Mahal the True Story by P.N.Oak : part one
Tejo Mahalaya : A Rajput Palace
Just Trying to Understand what Oak has proved in his book as this book is not easily available in India ,Just writing down few important points .
A revolutionary work of historical research by P.N. Oak. In this book, the author tries to prove that Taj Mahal was not built by Shah Jahan but usurped by him from Jai Singh, the king of Jaipur and remodeled before burying Mumtas.Oak gives many proofs to prove his theory that Taj is a ancient Indian palace.
It is a pity that the Taj Mahal is believed to have originated
as a sombre tomb in the 17th century when it was perhaps built in the 4th century to serve as a palace. The author says that claims that far from originating as a mediaeval tomb the Taj was built by a powerful Rajput king as his palace in pre-Muslim times.
the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Taj Mahal building-complex comprises stables and guest and guard rooms.
the Taj Mahal must have originated as Tejo Mahalaya completed in 1155-56
A.D.
A corollary is that buildings in India and West Asia
which have a resemblance to the Taj Mahal are products of the Indian architecture (Shilpashastra). People should look Taj Mahal as a palace and not as a tomb then they will realize the beauty of palace with people just go there, see 2 toms and leave the Taj.
Laymen sometimes ask that if the Taj Mahal existed centuries
before Mumtaz's death in 1630-31, could not the radioactive carbon
- 14 test be applied to determine its age? This is a question for
experts to answer. If they have an infallible method they .would
certainly detect the difference in age of the material used in the
cenotaphs and in most other parts of the Taj Mahal. But for any
such test to be useful its margin of error must be precisely known.
A five to ten years’ margin would not matter very much but if
it extends to several centuries the test would be unsuitable to
verify the accuracy of the conclusion drawn from historical evidence
that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu building commandeered for use as
a Muslim tomb.
A carbon-14 test has actually been carried out by a New York-based
laboratory, around 1974 A.D., on a piece of timber from a broken,
softened doorway plank of the rear, river-side, northeast doorway
of the Taj. It proved that the timber doorway pre. dated Shahjahan
by about 300 years.
Taj Mahal alias Tejomahalaya palace complex has existed centuries before
Shahjahan.
It needs to be realized that Islam originated in Mecca only 1370
years ago. In other lands swept by Islam it is not even that ancient.
the Tajmahal
complex consists of several seven-storied edifices of which only
garden level floors are open to the public while the others are either
sealed with brick and lime by Shahjahan or are kept intriguingly
locked by the Indian Government’s Archaeological Survey of India
(ASI).
Had the ASI been honest to its job it would have dredged
even the water in the seven-storied well to see whether important
articles, idols or inscriptions lie jettisoned there.
The conclusion whether it was Shahjahan who started raising
the Taj Mahal in 1631 A.D. as a sepulcher or it was some Hindu
Maharaja who had built it centuries earlier is not to be considered
as a Hindu-Muslim dispute and therefore to be severely shunned.
It is a question of scientific, academic competence and arriving
at a correct judgment as being able to distinguish between brass
and gold.
Our research has firmly established that the term Taj Mahal
is a popular mispronunciation of the ancient Hindu name
Tejomahalaya.
Yet we feel that more research needs to be done by opening
up the thousands of sealed chambers of the several seven-storied
buildings and other multi -storied edifices (such as the Nagar Khanas )
to probe their hidden contents since they could yield a number
of idols, inscriptions, coins, documents etc.
Shahjahan's court chronicle the Badshanama
acknowledges it as 'Manzil-e-Raja Mansingh' (i. e. Raja Mansingh's
mansion). Thus Raja Mansingh was the last Hindu owner in the
chequered and scarred history of the Taj Mahal.
The author demands that ,
All the locked rooms in all the multi-storied buildings in the Taj Mahal
complex should be open to visitors The ASI should be directed
to open up all the rooms in all the stories of all the buildings
barred by Shahjahan with brick and lime and study the evidence
that may be discovered Free entry on Fridays causing a revenue
loss to the Government should be discontinued because there is
no mosque in the Tejomahalaya premises.
Author says that in ancient times this palace was a Shiva temple then in a period of time it became the palace .
So many concocted accounts of the mythical Shahjahan
authorship of the Taj Mahal have been afloat for the last 350 years
that one wonders how they never aroused anybody's suspicion.
Thus we have scholar after scholar of Indian history from almost
every part of the world rapturously recounting to us how the cost
of the Taj Mahal could be anything between four to ninety million
rupees, the designer could be anybody from a Turk, Persian or
Italian to a Frenchman, the period of construction could be anywhere
between 10 and 22 years, and Mumtaz, the so-called Lady of the
Taj Mahal, could have been buried in its basement or upper floor
at any time from six months to nine years after her death. These
are only a few absurdities, anomalies and inconsistencies of the
Taj Mahal story. There are many more which we propose to expose
in the following pages.
Before believing in the "fabulous mausoleum" theory, two
questions may be asked. Firstly, where are the historical records
describing Shahjahan's romantic attachment to Mumtaz - one of
his 5,000 consorts, prior to her death ? Secondly, how many palaces
did Shahjahan build for his sweetheart Mumtaz while she was alive
before he built one over her dead body ?
Histories are silent on both these points. The answer to the
first is that there are no accounts of the Shahjahan Mumtaz romance
because there never was any. That so called romantic attachment
was a graft to justify the mythical creation of the Taj Mahal as
a wonder tomb. The answer to the second question is that Shahjahan
did not build any palace for Mumtaz alive or dead.
Every Moghul monarch had at least 5,000 consorts in his harem and many more at his
command outside. He had hardly the time or the heart to idolize
only one of his several thousand consorts. The author has in his book states,takes help from following old books .
P. 3 The History of India as Told by its Own Historians. Vol.
VII, The Posthumous Papers of the late Sir H. M. Elliot, K.C.B. edited
by Professor John Dowson, M.R.A.S., published by Kitab Mahal (Private)
Ltd. 56-A Zero Road, Allahabad.
2. Persian text of Mulla Abdul Hamid's Badshahnama, in two volumes,
published by the Asiatic Society of Bengal in the Bibliotheca Indies series.
I obtained the photostat from the copy in the National Archives, Government
of India, in December 1966. Copies of that publication are available in
all important institutional libraries throughout the world, dealing with Indian
mediaeval history. Following are the just few lines which I am here reproducing it .
During the journey countless coins be distributed among the
fakirs and needy, The site covered with a majestic magnificent lush garden, to the south of that great city and Amidst which (garden) the building known as the palace
(Manzil) of Raja Mansingh, at present owned by Raja Jaisingh, Grandson (of Mansingh), was selected for the burial of the Queen whose abode is in heaven Although Raja Jaisingh valued it greatly as his ancestral heritage and property, yet. he would have been agreeable to part with it gratis for the Emperor Shahjahan . (Still) out of sheer scrupulousness so essential in matters of bereavement and religious sanctity (thinking it improper to take his palace gratis) . In exchange of that (aali Manzil) grand palace, he (Jaisingh) was granted a piece of government land.
Emperor Shahjahan's wife Arjumand Banu died in Burhanpur
somewhere between 1629 and 1632 A.D. Her body was buried in
a garden there but is said to have been exhumed after about six
months and transported to Agra. Even this single detail should
have been enough to alert discerning and thoughtful people that
Shahjahan must have come by a handy ready-made mausoleum.
Why else would he disturb and remove a body well laid to rest
and have it carried to Agra, 600 miles away! He wouldn't want
it to be transferred from one open grave to another without some
purpose. Even a commoner's body is not so trifled with, let alone
that of a queen and believed to be a very 'beloved' one at that.
Moreover if Shahjahan had really commisioned the Taj Mahal he
should have raised it at Burhanpur where Mumtaz was already buried.
Such careful checking at every stage, so essential for accurate
historical research has been lacking in the field of Indian history.
On arrival in Agra, Mumtaz's body was buried underneath the
dome of Mansingh's palatial mansion under royal command, says
the Badshahnama. the Badshahnama clearly
asserts that it was Jaisingh who was given land while Shahjahan
got Mansingh's garden palace in exchange. This is one more detail
proving how the entire Shahjahan legend of the Taj Mahal is wholly
fictitious from beginning to end.
The Mumtaz burial story is so confusing ,gives so many different views that
One doubts that and says that Taj Mahal is a ancient Indian palace.
the exchange itself sounds a mere
myth because the location and dimensions of the plot of land given
to Jaisingh are not mentioned.
The palace had a sky-high dome underneath which, the author
of the Badshanama tells us, Mumtaz's body was hidden (i.e. buried)
from the eyes of the world by the officials of the realm at Shahjahan's
command. Such command again was unnecessary unless Mumtaz
had to be buried in somebody else's property. The use of the word
' 'command" is thus significant. We shall show that 104 years earlier
Emperor Babur also refers to this domed palace.
The Badshahnama clearly tells us that the Hindu
palace taken over for Mumtaz's burial had a dome. Incidentally
the edifice is also described as a "sky-high" mansion, though
those adjectives have been also interlinked with Shahjahan's courage
and valour.
Shahjahan's own court-chronicler admits the Taj Mahal to be a domed Hindu palace
commandeered for queen Mumtaz's burial.
"Jean Baptiste Tavernier, a French jeweler, toured India for
trade between 1641 and 1668 A. D. His travel account is mainly
devoted to commerce. He used to sojourn at Surat and Agra.
Mumtaz had died sometime between
1629 and 1632. Tavernier arrived in India nearly 11 years after
Mumtaz's demise.
according to Tavernier no work was undertaken concerning Mumtaz's tomb at least for 11 years after her death. Muslim and Tavernier's versions. Some of the former say that the Taj Mahal was complete by 1643 while Tavernier tells us that
the work concerning the mausoleum was not even begun by at
least 1641.
Shahjahan had been deposed and
incarcerated by his son Emperor Aurangzeb in 1658. Tavernier also
notes that the work took 22 years to complete. That means that
even if the work began in 1641 it ended only in 1663. This was
impossible since Shahjahan was no longer on the throne after 1658.
From olden times Muslim kings a tradition can be found is that they took readymade palaces and converted them to tomb or converted to Islamic buildings .
We would also like to draw the reader's attention to Tavernier's
words, "Shahjahan purposely made the tomb near the Tasimacan
(which had six large courts) where all foreigners come, so that
the whole world should see and admire it." The word Tasimacan
is Taz-i-macan, i.e. royal residence, which is synonymous with
Taj Mahal. That is to say, the Hindu palace was known as Tasimacan
alias Taj Mahal even before Mumtaz's burial, according to Tavernier.
Tavernier's remark that Shahjahan had to use bricks even to
a support arch is of special significance. It means that the "arches"
existed already. It may be noted that Koranic engravings on the
Taj Mahal are made around the arches. When the original stone
slabs were removed by Shahjahan and were substituted by other
slabs with the Muslim lettering, the arches so tampered with had
to be supported with bricks. So this part of Tavernier's observation
also proves that the Taj Mahal with its arched entrances existed
even before Mumtaz's death.
British Scholar Keene states that Tavernier could
be in India only sometime between the years 1651-1655.
Tavernier's noting makes out four specific points, namely :
1. That Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near a bazaar known
as Tasimacan (i.e. Taj Mahal). 2. That he could not get any timber
for the scaffolding. 3. That the cost of the scaffolding was more
than that of the entire work. 4. That 20,000 laborers worked
incessantly for 22 years.
Of the above the first three points clearly imply that Shahjahan
took over a ready Taj Mahal for Mumtaz's burial. The fourth point
on which traditional historians have banked does not make any
sense when it is considered that a Tavernier staying in India only
for four years (1651-1655) cannot assert that the work which began
and ended in his presence lasted for 22 years.
This shows that Tanvir is not reliable .
Tanvirs statements support Mr.Oak statements as well as what we read in our history books .So he is not reliable.
Continued :
Taj Mahal the True Story by P.N.Oak : part one
Tejo Mahalaya : A Rajput Palace
Just Trying to Understand what Oak has proved in his book as this book is not easily available in India ,Just writing down few important points .
A revolutionary work of historical research by P.N. Oak. In this book, the author tries to prove that Taj Mahal was not built by Shah Jahan but usurped by him from Jai Singh, the king of Jaipur and remodeled before burying Mumtas.Oak gives many proofs to prove his theory that Taj is a ancient Indian palace.
It is a pity that the Taj Mahal is believed to have originated
as a sombre tomb in the 17th century when it was perhaps built in the 4th century to serve as a palace. The author says that claims that far from originating as a mediaeval tomb the Taj was built by a powerful Rajput king as his palace in pre-Muslim times.
the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Taj Mahal building-complex comprises stables and guest and guard rooms.
the Taj Mahal must have originated as Tejo Mahalaya completed in 1155-56
A.D.
A corollary is that buildings in India and West Asia
which have a resemblance to the Taj Mahal are products of the Indian architecture (Shilpashastra). People should look Taj Mahal as a palace and not as a tomb then they will realize the beauty of palace with people just go there, see 2 toms and leave the Taj.
Laymen sometimes ask that if the Taj Mahal existed centuries
before Mumtaz's death in 1630-31, could not the radioactive carbon
- 14 test be applied to determine its age? This is a question for
experts to answer. If they have an infallible method they .would
certainly detect the difference in age of the material used in the
cenotaphs and in most other parts of the Taj Mahal. But for any
such test to be useful its margin of error must be precisely known.
A five to ten years’ margin would not matter very much but if
it extends to several centuries the test would be unsuitable to
verify the accuracy of the conclusion drawn from historical evidence
that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu building commandeered for use as
a Muslim tomb.
A carbon-14 test has actually been carried out by a New York-based
laboratory, around 1974 A.D., on a piece of timber from a broken,
softened doorway plank of the rear, river-side, northeast doorway
of the Taj. It proved that the timber doorway pre. dated Shahjahan
by about 300 years.
Taj Mahal alias Tejomahalaya palace complex has existed centuries before
Shahjahan.
It needs to be realized that Islam originated in Mecca only 1370
years ago. In other lands swept by Islam it is not even that ancient.
the Tajmahal
complex consists of several seven-storied edifices of which only
garden level floors are open to the public while the others are either
sealed with brick and lime by Shahjahan or are kept intriguingly
locked by the Indian Government’s Archaeological Survey of India
(ASI).
Had the ASI been honest to its job it would have dredged
even the water in the seven-storied well to see whether important
articles, idols or inscriptions lie jettisoned there.
The conclusion whether it was Shahjahan who started raising
the Taj Mahal in 1631 A.D. as a sepulcher or it was some Hindu
Maharaja who had built it centuries earlier is not to be considered
as a Hindu-Muslim dispute and therefore to be severely shunned.
It is a question of scientific, academic competence and arriving
at a correct judgment as being able to distinguish between brass
and gold.
Our research has firmly established that the term Taj Mahal
is a popular mispronunciation of the ancient Hindu name
Tejomahalaya.
Yet we feel that more research needs to be done by opening
up the thousands of sealed chambers of the several seven-storied
buildings and other multi -storied edifices (such as the Nagar Khanas )
to probe their hidden contents since they could yield a number
of idols, inscriptions, coins, documents etc.
Shahjahan's court chronicle the Badshanama
acknowledges it as 'Manzil-e-Raja Mansingh' (i. e. Raja Mansingh's
mansion). Thus Raja Mansingh was the last Hindu owner in the
chequered and scarred history of the Taj Mahal.
The author demands that ,
All the locked rooms in all the multi-storied buildings in the Taj Mahal
complex should be open to visitors The ASI should be directed
to open up all the rooms in all the stories of all the buildings
barred by Shahjahan with brick and lime and study the evidence
that may be discovered Free entry on Fridays causing a revenue
loss to the Government should be discontinued because there is
no mosque in the Tejomahalaya premises.
Author says that in ancient times this palace was a Shiva temple then in a period of time it became the palace .
So many concocted accounts of the mythical Shahjahan
authorship of the Taj Mahal have been afloat for the last 350 years
that one wonders how they never aroused anybody's suspicion.
Thus we have scholar after scholar of Indian history from almost
every part of the world rapturously recounting to us how the cost
of the Taj Mahal could be anything between four to ninety million
rupees, the designer could be anybody from a Turk, Persian or
Italian to a Frenchman, the period of construction could be anywhere
between 10 and 22 years, and Mumtaz, the so-called Lady of the
Taj Mahal, could have been buried in its basement or upper floor
at any time from six months to nine years after her death. These
are only a few absurdities, anomalies and inconsistencies of the
Taj Mahal story. There are many more which we propose to expose
in the following pages.
Before believing in the "fabulous mausoleum" theory, two
questions may be asked. Firstly, where are the historical records
describing Shahjahan's romantic attachment to Mumtaz - one of
his 5,000 consorts, prior to her death ? Secondly, how many palaces
did Shahjahan build for his sweetheart Mumtaz while she was alive
before he built one over her dead body ?
Histories are silent on both these points. The answer to the
first is that there are no accounts of the Shahjahan Mumtaz romance
because there never was any. That so called romantic attachment
was a graft to justify the mythical creation of the Taj Mahal as
a wonder tomb. The answer to the second question is that Shahjahan
did not build any palace for Mumtaz alive or dead.
Every Moghul monarch had at least 5,000 consorts in his harem and many more at his
command outside. He had hardly the time or the heart to idolize
only one of his several thousand consorts. The author has in his book states,takes help from following old books .
P. 3 The History of India as Told by its Own Historians. Vol.
VII, The Posthumous Papers of the late Sir H. M. Elliot, K.C.B. edited
by Professor John Dowson, M.R.A.S., published by Kitab Mahal (Private)
Ltd. 56-A Zero Road, Allahabad.
2. Persian text of Mulla Abdul Hamid's Badshahnama, in two volumes,
published by the Asiatic Society of Bengal in the Bibliotheca Indies series.
I obtained the photostat from the copy in the National Archives, Government
of India, in December 1966. Copies of that publication are available in
all important institutional libraries throughout the world, dealing with Indian
mediaeval history. Following are the just few lines which I am here reproducing it .
During the journey countless coins be distributed among the
fakirs and needy, The site covered with a majestic magnificent lush garden, to the south of that great city and Amidst which (garden) the building known as the palace
(Manzil) of Raja Mansingh, at present owned by Raja Jaisingh, Grandson (of Mansingh), was selected for the burial of the Queen whose abode is in heaven Although Raja Jaisingh valued it greatly as his ancestral heritage and property, yet. he would have been agreeable to part with it gratis for the Emperor Shahjahan . (Still) out of sheer scrupulousness so essential in matters of bereavement and religious sanctity (thinking it improper to take his palace gratis) . In exchange of that (aali Manzil) grand palace, he (Jaisingh) was granted a piece of government land.
Emperor Shahjahan's wife Arjumand Banu died in Burhanpur
somewhere between 1629 and 1632 A.D. Her body was buried in
a garden there but is said to have been exhumed after about six
months and transported to Agra. Even this single detail should
have been enough to alert discerning and thoughtful people that
Shahjahan must have come by a handy ready-made mausoleum.
Why else would he disturb and remove a body well laid to rest
and have it carried to Agra, 600 miles away! He wouldn't want
it to be transferred from one open grave to another without some
purpose. Even a commoner's body is not so trifled with, let alone
that of a queen and believed to be a very 'beloved' one at that.
Moreover if Shahjahan had really commisioned the Taj Mahal he
should have raised it at Burhanpur where Mumtaz was already buried.
Such careful checking at every stage, so essential for accurate
historical research has been lacking in the field of Indian history.
On arrival in Agra, Mumtaz's body was buried underneath the
dome of Mansingh's palatial mansion under royal command, says
the Badshahnama. the Badshahnama clearly
asserts that it was Jaisingh who was given land while Shahjahan
got Mansingh's garden palace in exchange. This is one more detail
proving how the entire Shahjahan legend of the Taj Mahal is wholly
fictitious from beginning to end.
The Mumtaz burial story is so confusing ,gives so many different views that
One doubts that and says that Taj Mahal is a ancient Indian palace.
the exchange itself sounds a mere
myth because the location and dimensions of the plot of land given
to Jaisingh are not mentioned.
The palace had a sky-high dome underneath which, the author
of the Badshanama tells us, Mumtaz's body was hidden (i.e. buried)
from the eyes of the world by the officials of the realm at Shahjahan's
command. Such command again was unnecessary unless Mumtaz
had to be buried in somebody else's property. The use of the word
' 'command" is thus significant. We shall show that 104 years earlier
Emperor Babur also refers to this domed palace.
The Badshahnama clearly tells us that the Hindu
palace taken over for Mumtaz's burial had a dome. Incidentally
the edifice is also described as a "sky-high" mansion, though
those adjectives have been also interlinked with Shahjahan's courage
and valour.
Shahjahan's own court-chronicler admits the Taj Mahal to be a domed Hindu palace
commandeered for queen Mumtaz's burial.
"Jean Baptiste Tavernier, a French jeweler, toured India for
trade between 1641 and 1668 A. D. His travel account is mainly
devoted to commerce. He used to sojourn at Surat and Agra.
Mumtaz had died sometime between
1629 and 1632. Tavernier arrived in India nearly 11 years after
Mumtaz's demise.
according to Tavernier no work was undertaken concerning Mumtaz's tomb at least for 11 years after her death. Muslim and Tavernier's versions. Some of the former say that the Taj Mahal was complete by 1643 while Tavernier tells us that
the work concerning the mausoleum was not even begun by at
least 1641.
Shahjahan had been deposed and
incarcerated by his son Emperor Aurangzeb in 1658. Tavernier also
notes that the work took 22 years to complete. That means that
even if the work began in 1641 it ended only in 1663. This was
impossible since Shahjahan was no longer on the throne after 1658.
From olden times Muslim kings a tradition can be found is that they took readymade palaces and converted them to tomb or converted to Islamic buildings .
We would also like to draw the reader's attention to Tavernier's
words, "Shahjahan purposely made the tomb near the Tasimacan
(which had six large courts) where all foreigners come, so that
the whole world should see and admire it." The word Tasimacan
is Taz-i-macan, i.e. royal residence, which is synonymous with
Taj Mahal. That is to say, the Hindu palace was known as Tasimacan
alias Taj Mahal even before Mumtaz's burial, according to Tavernier.
Tavernier's remark that Shahjahan had to use bricks even to
a support arch is of special significance. It means that the "arches"
existed already. It may be noted that Koranic engravings on the
Taj Mahal are made around the arches. When the original stone
slabs were removed by Shahjahan and were substituted by other
slabs with the Muslim lettering, the arches so tampered with had
to be supported with bricks. So this part of Tavernier's observation
also proves that the Taj Mahal with its arched entrances existed
even before Mumtaz's death.
British Scholar Keene states that Tavernier could
be in India only sometime between the years 1651-1655.
Tavernier's noting makes out four specific points, namely :
1. That Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near a bazaar known
as Tasimacan (i.e. Taj Mahal). 2. That he could not get any timber
for the scaffolding. 3. That the cost of the scaffolding was more
than that of the entire work. 4. That 20,000 laborers worked
incessantly for 22 years.
Of the above the first three points clearly imply that Shahjahan
took over a ready Taj Mahal for Mumtaz's burial. The fourth point
on which traditional historians have banked does not make any
sense when it is considered that a Tavernier staying in India only
for four years (1651-1655) cannot assert that the work which began
and ended in his presence lasted for 22 years.
This shows that Tanvir is not reliable .
Tanvirs statements support Mr.Oak statements as well as what we read in our history books .So he is not reliable.
Continued :
Monday, May 4, 2009
India says goodbye to Voting
Reality views by sm:
India elections 2009 A tragedy or a comedy show:
India says goodbye to voting.
What we learned in this elections as an Indian.
Indian democracy is for rich by rich and a comedy or tragedy show for common Indians.
Salman khan and Pretty Zinta did not vote I don’t know reason I request you when you will support them or watch there movies remember this they didn’t vote for common mans India.
Even Common man of India is shameless, they came they killed us but you slept and enjoyed movies or visited to goa and London to enjoy on the eve of voting day.
Shame on India.
How our parliament will now look?
Now our parliament will look like this all rich people or gundas will be our member of parliament. You will say so what?
Now what happens is that if he is gunda, CBI and police department obey him and they will follow his order and he will continue to do his bad activities and get relief from courts, judiciary as investigating departments will obey and do as he orders.
Now if rich man becomes Member of Parliament what he will do?
He will see that he tax choris , tax cases and frauds be legalized. 2nd is he will get all locations, lands at such a low rate that you can say it is as good as free.
Example is if someone gets land of 1000 crore from government of India in just rupees
200 crore or 40 crore what you will say?
3rd ly he will build the big hotels and malls on the reserved lands of army or reserved land for schools and school grounds, when construction is finished, our government babus will make it legal.
Today you have not voted remember your kids will kick you for this because you have destroyed there life and future by not voting for good candidates.
I wanted to say hey in India we don’t have democracy here, here its mob rule, money rule, power rule .and black mail rules.
What is Indian democracy: A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.
We saw this how many people voted and they like cowards hide in there homes.
I think we don’t need to give the holiday on the day of election on that place companies should see that employee goes and votes then, his manager checks he has voted or not
Then he can go home or work. We don’t deserve holiday on the day of election voting.
Don’t you think when we will get new prime minister he will be like biggest joke, as he is elected by only less than 50% or 45 or 25%?
Indian democracy has become a biggest joke on this earth.
Did you voted? If not Remember you are saying good bye to the good future of your kids .They will say good bye to you one day when you will need there help, why they should live in a corrupt country with corrupt parents.
Corruption is our national religion .I think they need bribes to go to voting booths also.
How much bribe you want corrupt Indians to vote?
What is reason you are not voting if you are not corrupt?
I hope next time Mr. Rich will make such advertisements vote and earn.
Even election commission of India should make bribes legal when they are offered as encouragement to vote, currently they give such notes illegally to uneducated people or slum people .Once it is legal they will give these offers to all Indians, and we will have more than 75% voting in India.
India elections 2009 A tragedy or a comedy show:
India says goodbye to voting.
What we learned in this elections as an Indian.
Indian democracy is for rich by rich and a comedy or tragedy show for common Indians.
Salman khan and Pretty Zinta did not vote I don’t know reason I request you when you will support them or watch there movies remember this they didn’t vote for common mans India.
Even Common man of India is shameless, they came they killed us but you slept and enjoyed movies or visited to goa and London to enjoy on the eve of voting day.
Shame on India.
How our parliament will now look?
Now our parliament will look like this all rich people or gundas will be our member of parliament. You will say so what?
Now what happens is that if he is gunda, CBI and police department obey him and they will follow his order and he will continue to do his bad activities and get relief from courts, judiciary as investigating departments will obey and do as he orders.
Now if rich man becomes Member of Parliament what he will do?
He will see that he tax choris , tax cases and frauds be legalized. 2nd is he will get all locations, lands at such a low rate that you can say it is as good as free.
Example is if someone gets land of 1000 crore from government of India in just rupees
200 crore or 40 crore what you will say?
3rd ly he will build the big hotels and malls on the reserved lands of army or reserved land for schools and school grounds, when construction is finished, our government babus will make it legal.
Today you have not voted remember your kids will kick you for this because you have destroyed there life and future by not voting for good candidates.
I wanted to say hey in India we don’t have democracy here, here its mob rule, money rule, power rule .and black mail rules.
What is Indian democracy: A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.
We saw this how many people voted and they like cowards hide in there homes.
I think we don’t need to give the holiday on the day of election on that place companies should see that employee goes and votes then, his manager checks he has voted or not
Then he can go home or work. We don’t deserve holiday on the day of election voting.
Don’t you think when we will get new prime minister he will be like biggest joke, as he is elected by only less than 50% or 45 or 25%?
Indian democracy has become a biggest joke on this earth.
Did you voted? If not Remember you are saying good bye to the good future of your kids .They will say good bye to you one day when you will need there help, why they should live in a corrupt country with corrupt parents.
Corruption is our national religion .I think they need bribes to go to voting booths also.
How much bribe you want corrupt Indians to vote?
What is reason you are not voting if you are not corrupt?
I hope next time Mr. Rich will make such advertisements vote and earn.
Even election commission of India should make bribes legal when they are offered as encouragement to vote, currently they give such notes illegally to uneducated people or slum people .Once it is legal they will give these offers to all Indians, and we will have more than 75% voting in India.
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Modern India and caste system effects.
Modern India and caste system effects.
It is not possible to break Caste without annihilating the religious notions on
Which it, the Caste system, is founded."
Read more »
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)